I am open to correcting the record with you. Answer my questions then. You still refuse to retract your claim I spread anti-semitic literature around St. Mark's. You and I both know that is a lie. Why should I then believe anything else you say?

>No Planes on 9/11

Show the proof, Alba. Your story doesn't stand scrutiny. Especially when that video was enlarged and slowed-down and the object *still* could not be seen. How did you see it at 5 miles?

None of the Media clips match each other Alba. They show what is physically impossible. Do you believe known laws of physical reality or do you believe what you are shown on TV? Or told through Media?

>Grainy Video

You're just like the guys who screamed "hanging chads!" and pretended no one could determine whether a hole was punched or not - in order to steal the election.

When you say, "The video isn't clear." do you mean: " The video doesn't show the airplane that I know must be there?"

Yea, the Vids is grainy because enlarged. And when it is *not* blown up, and is shown at regular speed, it *still* doesn't show anything definite. It still doesn't show a blooming 767.




Deconstructiong the Naudet Propaganda Film
Deconstructing the Naudets� propaganda film By Jerry Mazza Online Journal Associate Editor

Same with the video of the Pentagon "hit.". Yea, it's clear. It's clearly does not show a Boeing 767.

Where is your proof? Your story isn't consistent. Did you listen to the radio show about the "War of the Worlds" radio broadcast?

9/11 was a Lethal "War of the Worlds"-style Media Hoax,
9/11 was a "War of the Worlds"-style Media Hoax, but a lethal one


http://www.youtube.com/v/fagHN3TD_Zw

>calling witnesses liars.

I am doubting you are a witness because I fail to understand how you could see the event at 5 miles away. As well as see the 2nd event when it happened on the other side of the South tower which faced away from you. I'd like to gain admittance into your former office building and see what the vantage is from the top floor, where you say you were. If you were actually in good faith and open to scientific investigation you would agree to this. This is only fair considering the extent that the public videos do not match one another.

Does Reality Change Depending On which Channel You Watch?
3 Channels, 3 Realities. TV News Manipulation Octopus 8

911 OCTOPUS 8 - Unmasking the Media Perps

As well as the extent to which the televised "witnesses" were nothing but bad actors:

Brainwashing 101

There's another 2 examples but there are embedded in longer clips.

And you stated you saw the 2nd event with a "bank" action on the part of the aircraft. That *never* showed on the clips. Am I supposed to believe you or the clips? Or what the networks tell me, considering they lied about *everything* else and our White House Squatter Resident , Mr. W. , just today proclaimed, "Money Trumps Peace." And people just keep drooling right along with him. 'Cept he's the smarter one!

Anything is politically possible in such a world. But the laws of science and reasoning don't change.

And there was not a airplane crash either at the Pentagon:

Pentagon Best Hits:

http://www.youtube.com/v/MhpsxD_qU40


Nor at Shanksville:


http://www.youtube.com/v/mb-5vBMekcY

And not at World Trade Towers:

oh my goodness !!

oh my goodness !!

Breaking! Direct Energy Weapons at NY Church. New Scandal around Haupt/Intellectual Property against Truthlings :)

Albanese, you repeat the same lines over and over again. What you repeat are "thought stopper" type of statements.

Our POV, myself and the people with whom I am researching this, has all the dynamism, since we are grappling with reality and science.

Like a fractal pattern that repeats on two divergent scales larger and smaller, you, who are constantly braking insight into the whole picture of what happened, mimic the blinded position of the culture at large.

Reality is that which when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - "Horselover Fat" Phillip K. Dick